kisana
08-15 11:07 AM
I am currently working for compnay A. I got selected for company B. They already started my H1B transfer. But some how I got in troouble in one offense. I already told my company about this offense, they are saying they will be able to support me on the employment point of view. I have fear in my my that if something goes wrong I may not be able to join that company.
I am curretly thinking to deny the offer. Compnay B is okay with that, only they are saying that they have to back out the paperworks i.e. probably cancel H1B transfer. Is is going to create any problem for me as my current employ is also ready to start my H1B renewal. Also I have EAD with me, is there going to be any problem for GC.
I am curretly thinking to deny the offer. Compnay B is okay with that, only they are saying that they have to back out the paperworks i.e. probably cancel H1B transfer. Is is going to create any problem for me as my current employ is also ready to start my H1B renewal. Also I have EAD with me, is there going to be any problem for GC.
wallpaper clarence clemons
vikrant29nov
03-06 10:34 PM
Thx IqAndreas (http://www.kirupa.com/forum/member.php?u=134305) :look: and Templarian (http://www.kirupa.com/forum/member.php?u=24487) :proud:
Many more words hidden there... waiting for more answers...
Good Luck guys :thumb:
Many more words hidden there... waiting for more answers...
Good Luck guys :thumb:
gcslave
07-08 05:30 PM
I didn't get an email, but I checked my case status online and it has changed to Decision today. Waiting to get the snail mail. Hopefully, it will move to card production ordered soon. My wife has a FP appt on Jul 15, so I wasn't expecting to get approval before that, but I guess sometimes the surprises are pleasant.
PD - Mar 21, 2005
PD - Mar 21, 2005
2011 Clarence Clemons of Bruce
jordanwillium
02-17 02:31 AM
I received a duplicate order from Hewlett-Packard. Per the customer service person I was instructed to remove the shipping label and write the return number on the box, then call Fed Ex for a pickup, all of which I did. Now, a few weeks later my credit card account has not been credited. I've called the customer service people several times, and received a transmitting tracking number for the return. I've called Fed Ex who say what I have is not adequate to track the item supposedly sitting at their warehouse. I've spoken to the supervisor at HP, and she, like everyone else, keeps referring my problem to the "return specialist", who is supposed to query Fed Ex about this, but nothing happens. Their excuse is that they don't have the actual tracking number to do this. One HP rep I spoke to told me that the return item had not been scanned since the initiation of the return, implying negligence. Yeah somebody dropped the ball. Where do I go next to get some action taken?
more...
haisylu
06-16 04:46 PM
Do I need to provide any proof during the interview stating he is my step son? or the documents between the mother and the son will suffice?
vban2007
10-24 03:45 PM
Please reply
more...
us_employee
08-24 02:36 PM
Dear Attorney,
Is there any minimum length of time to be on H4 before applying to H1.
Thanks
Is there any minimum length of time to be on H4 before applying to H1.
Thanks
2010 Bruce Springsteen And Clarence
sideeque
05-24 01:51 AM
I have already posted there.
more...
WhatWentWrong
05-14 05:23 PM
Hello,
Here's my situation:
H1b: 7th Year (valid through Nov 2009)
Labor: Approved
140: Approved
Category: EB2
Priority Date: Aug 2007
485/EAD: cannot file due to retrogression
I have a permanent employment offer from the employer where I am contracting, right now for the same job. Following are the questions I have:
1. Can I change my employer?
2. Can I retain my Priority date?
3. If the new employer files for transfer of H1, what does it mean to my extension beyond 7th year?
Please help.
Thank you.
Here's my situation:
H1b: 7th Year (valid through Nov 2009)
Labor: Approved
140: Approved
Category: EB2
Priority Date: Aug 2007
485/EAD: cannot file due to retrogression
I have a permanent employment offer from the employer where I am contracting, right now for the same job. Following are the questions I have:
1. Can I change my employer?
2. Can I retain my Priority date?
3. If the new employer files for transfer of H1, what does it mean to my extension beyond 7th year?
Please help.
Thank you.
hair Middlesomething » Clarence
paystubissue
03-17 09:15 PM
Hi All,
Thanks for the reply. Now I got some good idea.I will check with my lawyer too.
Regards
Thanks for the reply. Now I got some good idea.I will check with my lawyer too.
Regards
more...
TO BE OR NO TO BE
07-20 10:58 AM
Its not a surprise to anyone who is member of this forum that how efficient PEBC works!! As a matter of fact I have an excellent example here with my Labor Certification, which I wanted to share with you all.
My company just received a latter titled as "Confirmation of Withdrawal" which states that your Labor Processing Application filed in November xx, 2004 is withdrawn, as requested by your letter dated August xx, 2004.
Isn't that amazing that they are so swamped and desperate in eliminating the backlog that they do not know the chronological order of the dates also?
Backlog Elimination Centers' are the biggest waste of Taxpayers Money, I think.
My company just received a latter titled as "Confirmation of Withdrawal" which states that your Labor Processing Application filed in November xx, 2004 is withdrawn, as requested by your letter dated August xx, 2004.
Isn't that amazing that they are so swamped and desperate in eliminating the backlog that they do not know the chronological order of the dates also?
Backlog Elimination Centers' are the biggest waste of Taxpayers Money, I think.
hot Saxophonist Clarence Clemons
IN2US
02-23 01:03 PM
I'm a july filer and planning on using AC21 to change employers,in this process I'm transfering H1-B,My passport will expire in a month however my
I-94 is valid till 2010. My question is do I need to have a new passport in hand before I transfer my H1??
PS: I've already applied for my new passport and expecting it any time.
Thanks in advance
I-94 is valid till 2010. My question is do I need to have a new passport in hand before I transfer my H1??
PS: I've already applied for my new passport and expecting it any time.
Thanks in advance
more...
house Bruce Springsteen released a
calaway42
10-06 01:07 AM
tahnx and sorry :)
tattoo Bruce Springsteen.
pret_23
02-03 11:08 AM
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Slowdown_TCS_may_call_back_20_onsite_staff_in_US/articleshow/4044310.cms
more...
pictures Clarence Clemons amp; Bruce
sandeep_1
07-19 02:21 PM
oh my! It is really painful to see that you have been waiting this long.. Based on your priority date, you should be current next month. Good luck.
My husband was approved in August 2008 and I am still waiting after infopass, etc, etc...
My husband was approved in August 2008 and I am still waiting after infopass, etc, etc...
dresses Clarence Clemons and Bruce
Green4Ev1
04-27 11:42 AM
2 weeks at most
more...
makeup People-Clarence Clemons-Stroke
GCeffect
11-13 07:51 PM
Hi there:
My mother in law is visiting us. This is her 2nd time in this country. In 2007 when she visited us in USA, we applied for the extension and it was approved but the 2nd time when we applied for the extension again it was denied.
She is visiting us this year too. As usual she receved 6 months visa on the port of entry, we're planning to apply for the extension again. 6 month will expire on 29th of november, 2009. Also as we have out first kids about 4 months ago and that is another reson she wants to stay another 4/5 months.
In the reson of extension should we mention "she wants to stay for the baby" or should we mentioned about her anticipated trip to other states?
There are only 15 days left in her passport; is that okay to apply for the extension?
i'm ready with all the application paperworks. Any input is appreciated in the above mentioned matter.
My wife and my current status: i-485 pending for last 2.5 years.
Thanks ahead
My mother in law is visiting us. This is her 2nd time in this country. In 2007 when she visited us in USA, we applied for the extension and it was approved but the 2nd time when we applied for the extension again it was denied.
She is visiting us this year too. As usual she receved 6 months visa on the port of entry, we're planning to apply for the extension again. 6 month will expire on 29th of november, 2009. Also as we have out first kids about 4 months ago and that is another reson she wants to stay another 4/5 months.
In the reson of extension should we mention "she wants to stay for the baby" or should we mentioned about her anticipated trip to other states?
There are only 15 days left in her passport; is that okay to apply for the extension?
i'm ready with all the application paperworks. Any input is appreciated in the above mentioned matter.
My wife and my current status: i-485 pending for last 2.5 years.
Thanks ahead
girlfriend Bruce Springsteen, Clarence
gcformeornot
07-25 04:31 PM
Come on people please vote....
hairstyles Published in Bruce Springsteen
yabadaba
06-30 03:05 PM
250 words in the body of the thread. It can't be one liners.
That will explain why and what A thread is for. Otherwise, members will be scatching their heads and will show no further interest.
factory man i tried to be as detailed as possible. please give me ur suggestion and i ll change it accordingly
That will explain why and what A thread is for. Otherwise, members will be scatching their heads and will show no further interest.
factory man i tried to be as detailed as possible. please give me ur suggestion and i ll change it accordingly
krishna_brc
02-02 04:49 PM
I have received my green card 5 months ago and still working for the same GC filing employer(a consulting company). My wife had an RFE on her GC, since she could not take MMR at 2007 fiasco time. We have recently replied with the evidence. Now my project is getting over at the client site in next couple of weeks. I am sure that I can lose my job at consulting company also.
My question is, what happens to wife's GC? What if there is another RFE and how can I reply it?
Please let me know my options.
BTW - change your user id to GC_EB2_Received
!!!!! Just Kidding.
My question is, what happens to wife's GC? What if there is another RFE and how can I reply it?
Please let me know my options.
BTW - change your user id to GC_EB2_Received
!!!!! Just Kidding.
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
As a California immigration lawyer who files many asylum cases, I am used to thinking of a the United States as a place of refuge and to documenting the horrible country conditions of other countries. I have successfully represented applicants for asylum who feared staying in their countries because while serving in their countries' armies, they were harmed on account of their sexual orientation.
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment